2 WPF Climate Change Policy & Net Zero Strategy PDF 86 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The item was introduced by Dapo Shonola (Pensions Investment and Governance Manager). He drew members’ attention to the Fund’s key goals that would make it more resilient to risks associated with climate change, and informed members there was a focus on making investments in companies that had shown a commitment to reducing climate change and had shown good stewardship of other funds. He reminded members of the Fund’s target to be net zero by 2050 and the interim targets that had been put in place since the 2022 baseline. Progress would be reviewed and measured on an annual basis, and would be presented to the Pension Fund Investment Sub Committee as well as the Pension Board.
Responding to a question from Seb Burch, Dapo Shonola said most of
the Fund’s investments were placed through Border to Coast
rather than being dealt with by Fund officers themselves due to a
lack of capacity. A company had also been commissioned to take part
in votes on the Fund’s behalf. This company also worked on
behalf of other organisations that aligned with the Fund’s
values.
Regarding
engagement versus divestment, the Chair drew the Board’s
attention to the fact the Fund was also a member of the LAPFF
Forum. Although it did not give advice to Funds on how to invest,
the Forum was able to facilitate engagement between Funds that had
made investments in the same companies, and engagement with the
Chairs of those companies.
Responding to a question from Mike Snow about targets relating to
climate change, Dapo Shonola said the Fund’s policy was not
to be in the first or last five per cent of Funds making any
transitions. The rationale was the Fund didn’t want to take
undue risks by being first, but also did not want to lag behind
others by being too slow to enact any changes. The policies set out
there was a desire to be in the upper quartiles. However, they
would be reviewed on an annual basis. Officers from the Fund would
liaise with the Council to summarise and promote each other’s
climate strategies, and this would be promoted at the forthcoming
AGM. Chris Norton (Head of Investments, Audit and Risk) said there
had been a deliberate delay not to rush into making any commitments
relating to climate change so any proposals could be studied in
greater detail before a firm commitment was made. There were other
Funds that had made rash decisions relating to climate targets. Rob
Powell (Executive Director of Resources) said there were other
factors that would impact the Council’s moving targets, such
as the forthcoming American elections that could impact on the
performance of companies the Fund had made investments
into.
Members noted the contents of the report.