Venue: Committee Room 2, Shire Hall. View directions
Contact: Helen Barnsley Senior Democratic Services Officer
No. | Item |
---|---|
General Additional documents: |
|
Apologies Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Jerry Roodhouse (Vice-Chair), Councillor Jenny Fradgely is for Councillor Roodhouse.
Apologies were also received from Councillor Barbara Brown and Michael Cowland, Co-opted member. |
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Interests Additional documents: Minutes: None |
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 120 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes from the meeting held on the 18th June 2024 were agreed as a true and accurate record.
There were no matters arising.
|
|
Public Speaking Additional documents: Minutes: Sam Farr spoke to the committee in relation to her 12-year-old son who has special education needs. Sam started by saying that three minutes is not enough time to highlight the failings her family has faced from the education system.
“My 12-year-old son who since birth has had multiple surgeries and hospital stays, attended mainstream primary and secondary schools where he sat outside the classroom with 1-2-1 supervision. In year four, his case was due to be heard at a higher needs panel, but this did not happen for two years and eventually it was decided that a specialist placement should be sought.
In February 2023 when high school placements were announced, my son did not get one. I had questioned the content of his plan on numerous occasions; 17 schools had received information that my son was in nappies and could only manage two hours at school. This was not true. I was told this information was historic but relevant, but the plan suggested this was the current situation.
I requested a reassessment of his needs. It was declined. I appealed. The tribunal date is a year away. I then received contact from the legal team who wanted to reassess his needs. I feel this was rushed; there were no pushbacks unless I hounded and there were still no yeses to finding him a place.
The reasons for refusal included –
• Cannot rule out a corridor crush • Staff not adequately trained • Not suitable with the cohort – if anyone can explain this one to me, please do.
These were legal responses from specialists you approve. I started to contact the schools myself but couldn’t get a foot in the door so how could I possible name my preference. I did however find a school in July 2024 without any help or input from the local authority. For the whole year that this has gone on, my son received 9-hour tutoring and nine hours AP, but I had to fight to get him those hours, you did not want to give them to him. 18 hours was his legal entitlement to a full-time education.
His tutor was amazing. His AP mentors were amazing. But it would be interesting to see who monitors the policies and procedures because initially drop offs were whenever they felt like it and sessions were cancelled with a few hours’ notice.
He was put on a 2 to 1 after stating he would call the police after a mentor accidentally stood on one of his toes. That 2 to 1 should have been reviewed after half a term. You funded a 2 to 1 for an additional two months when his own mentor said it wasn’t needed.
His tutor and AP reports were fantastic. I asked if the reports could be used in his EHCP to help secure the best educational outcome. Your legal team answered – the LA does not detail strengths in plans. An EHCP does not define a child, but ... view the full minutes text for item 2. |
|
Question Time Additional documents: |
|
Questions to Cabinet Portfolio Holders Up to 30 minutes of the meeting are available for members of the Children & Young People Overview and Scrutiny Committee to put questions to the Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Education and Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children & Families.
The work programme attached lists any briefings circulated to the Committee since the last meeting and any items listed in the Council’s Forward Plan for decision by Cabinet or individual Cabinet Portfolio Holders over the coming months. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Piers Daniell asked Councillor Kam Kaur, Portfolio Holder for Education for confirmation in relation to the funding of early years education places for children with recognised SEND needs. Councillor Daniell stated that there seems to be an issue where children are moving through schools and the support isn’t continuing.
Councillor Kaur confirmed that funding should follow the child throughout the school. She thanked Councillor Daniell for raising the issues and confirmed that she will investigate whether the issue is as a result of children moving into schools outside of the county.
|
|
Updates from Cabinet Portfolio Holders and Directors Cabinet Portfolio Holders and Directors are invited to provide any updates they have on issues within the remit of the Committee. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Sue Markham, Portfolio Holder for Children and Families, provided an update to the committee in relation to recent commissioning activities at the council. The following points were highlighted –
|
|
Corporate Parenting Panel Update The Portfolio Holder for Children & Families to provide an update on the work of the Corporate Parenting Panel.
To include an update from the Children in Care Council and other forums. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Sue Markham, Portfolio Holder for Children and Families stated that she has a lot to update the committee on in relation to the work of the Corporate Parenting Panel (CPP).
|
|
Council Delivery Plan and Performance Q1 PDF 146 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: John Coleman, Director of Children and Families presented the report to the committee and confirmed that there were summary points available in appendix one. It was also confirmed that the number of measures for the committee to review has been reduced to allow focus on particular areas. It was noted that 7 focus areas are currently on track, and 3 are not on track.
The committee noted that the overall number of Children in Care has continued to reduce, with the latest a significant reduction of 68. This is, in part, due to the increase in the number of children being placed with family members of being returned home where safe to do so.
It was confirmed that Warwickshire does need more foster carers. There will be a new marketing campaign launched shortly however, 8 mainstream foster carers have been approved with 8 more in the pipeline. This is the highest number for some time but there is still room for improvement.
In relation to Education Services, performance in relation to attendance is good. The Early Help support is on track, but officers are working towards more early support being in place.
Performance in relation to safer accommodation (following domestic abuse) is not currently on track but is showing signed of improvement. There is a plan to source accommodation, renovate and launch. This is not where officers want to be, but things are progressing and moving in the right direction.
In relation to the completion of Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCP) within 20 weeks, it was confirmed that performance is not currently on track, but plans are in place to make improvements. Demand has doubled recently but the resources available to officers, have not increased. The council has bought in some agency staff to offer support at the assessment phase.
It was confirmed that the Warwickshire education strategy has been approved and is now in place. The new term has now started and started well. On October 3rd, 2024, there will be a conference to launch the strategy to the wider school community and incudes priorities for the next five years.
In relation to the overspend reported in appendix three, John Coleman confirmed that this has reduced from £10 million to £7 million. This is still a significant overspend but does show the work undertaken to reduce the overspend. The majority of the over spend comes from residential care, and there has been a significant increase in these costs. We do not accept any residential care placement that doesn’t include education. Other work to reduce the overspend has included ending fixed term staff contract earlier where possible as well as accelerating plans for children to leave care plans, when it is absolutely right for the child/ren; for example, step down care plan to foster carers. It was confirmed that there is a strategic lens to the barriers in place but at the forefront of all our minds is what is best for the children and young people. ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
Childrens OSC Feedback report PDF 395 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Ruth Rollings, Service Manager – Customer Relations (Complaints Manager) gave a brief overview of the report and of the individual services in the report. It was highlighted to the committee that complaints in relation to the Children and Families service are reducing; in addition, compliments are increasing. In 2023/24 the number of compliments increased by 39% to 25, indicating improvement in service and customer satisfaction.
The top category for complaints within the children and families service is protection of user – when a member of staff is specifically named in a complaint. The other top categories include WCC service standards and staff conduct. The top categories for complaints within the education service are communication, WCC service standards and protection of user.
It was noted that a high proportion of complaints are completed outside of timescales. (See appendix 1). More targeted work is required within services on the importance of closing complaints within timescales.
The committee noted that officers had identified lessons learned and were actioning and recording progress made against them; it was acknowledged that this is critical work in order to improve the service. Examples of identified lessons learned include –
process.
being progressed to prevent delays.
the customer relations team.
Special Guardianship Order.
investigating complaints
Councillor Penny-Anne O’Donnell commented that it had been lovely for the committee to hear that compliments were increasing and asked where the council stood in comparison to neighbouring authorities. Ruth Rollings confirmed that benchmarking was still underway but that the information should be ready in time for the next time this report is presented to the committee. All members of the committee agreed that being able to benchmark the council’s performance would be really useful.
Councillor Jill Simpson-Vince added that given the issues the council faced with the school admission process, it was very encouraging to see the reduction in complaints and showed that the work being done by officers is working.
The Chair requested that the committee receive a further update from Ruth at the meeting in February 2025.
Resolved That the Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Committee considers and comments on the contents of the report.
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: George Shipman, Head of Children's Pathfinder Programme presented the report to the committee and confirmed the following highlights from the plan -
The youth justice plan is a requirement from the crime and disorder act 1998. It is an annual plan that goes through the council process to be signed off by full council. The committee was informed that this will be the last annual plan as it is moving to three-year plan with annual updates. There were several changes to this year’s plan, including multi agency safeguarding arrangements, so it wasn’t the best time to move to three yearly.
The plan has a set proforma to complete. The committee was asked to note expectations from the youth justice board including, child first principles, evidence-based practices and putting children at the heart of the service. Work will include promoting positive elements and thinking about positive behaviour.
Last year’s plan set out four priorities – core good practice, day to day work of the service, reviewing policies and procedure and multi-agency/disciplinary process: being open and honest with all partners.
The plan builds on the progress made in 2023/24 including the embedding of the ARC (Attachment, Regulation, Competency) Trauma Informed Model. This work will include thinking about interventions delivered to children and young people and what other tools are available. This has been funded for a two-year period.
There will also be a focus on the prevention of serious violence with a focus on prevention with the development of pathways team getting involved at the earliest opportunities. There will also be a targeted offer to schools to reduce the likelihood of young people getting involved in serious violence.
In relation to harmful sexual behaviours, it was confirmed that a new partnerships document has been produced and training is being rolled out to schools around the county on identifying behaviours and how to access support.
It was confirmed that reoffending rates are steadily declining. There is a strong relationship between the service and the court.
Moving forward, key challenges were noted; strengthening governance and partnership working and making sure the service is inspection ready. The committee noted that the service is currently in a really strong place.
There is some fixed term funding in place, primarily for the prevention work. This will come to an end and sources for further funding are currently unclear; a number of changes may need to be made – sustainability is key
It was confirmed that a holistic approach to health, speech and language therapy has made a difference to the service along with substance misuse support. In relation to victim support and restorative justice, the service is working towards a quality assurance mark for victim support. Only a small number of youth justice services have achieved this, so it is a key aim for the team.
Councillor Penny-Anne O’Donnell thanked officers for a very positive report and added a well done to the team for the recognition they have received. Following a question from Councillor O’Donnell ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|
Work Programme and items on the Forward Plan PDF 101 KB Up to date work programme to be presented to the Committee.
Items from the Forward Plan relevant to the remit of the Committee to be noted. Additional documents: Minutes: Following the update from Councillor Sue Markham in relation to commissioning, it was agreed to add this as a regular update – either verbally or as a report when required. It was agreed that briefing notes would also be a good way to get commissioning updates to the committee.
It was agreed that t report on Children and Family Centres would be presented at the meeting in February 2025.
It was confirmed that an update report in relation to Childrens OSC Feedback would be presented at the meeting in February 2025.
The Committee noted and agreed the updated work programme and items on the Forward Plan relevant to the remit of the Committee.
|
|
Date of Next Meeting The next meeting will be held on XXXXXXX Additional documents: Minutes: The next meeting date is scheduled for Tuesday 26th November 2024 at 10am.
The meeting will be held at Shire Hall, Warwick.
|